FBI Director James Comey – You are stuck with me America

fbi-director-james-comey-crimeshop

Director of the FBI – James Comey

Today during a Boston Cyber Security Conference, our very own FBI director one James Comey informed the world that we are stuck with him for the next roughly 6 ½ years.  

His announcement comes just days after he passionately refuted Donald Trump’s claims that the FBI broke the law and at the discretion of former President Obama wire tapped Trump’s phones during the 2016 election.

Despite James pushing back against Trump’s claims, James still has the full support of Donald Trump.

president-donald-trump-crimeshop

So what if anyone tapped Trump’s phones, we seem to have bigger issues at hand with everything that WikiLeaks just released yesterday, most of which has been confirmed as accurate.

In short, we seem to be experiencing a bit of a problem with sensitive and secret intel just strolling out the doors of some of our most so called secure and trust agencies here in the US.

Tapping Trump’s phones during the election pales in comparison.

What’s more is that Donald is a ranter, the type of guy that goes off without any forethought on the matter and just rants straight off the cusp so tapping his phone would not have garnered any intel whatsoever.

One has to wonder, did Donald make yet another false claim because he simply wants attention?

Personally, I am leaning towards yes because he wants everyone to worship him as the hero who saved America.

Which so far, he happens to be failing at.

He has been quite successful at dividing american’s however.

Sadly, being an inhumane individual will not garner him the worship that he so desires and wildly like a child accusing the FBI of breaking the law is a mistake that Trump would be smart to avoid in the future.

In any case, we can all still sit back and continue to watch Trump dig himself that big grave he keeps working on.

Cristal M Clark

IOS users can find The Crime Shop on Apple News

@thecrimeshop on twitter

And https://gab.ai/thecrimeshop

Florida ending permanent felon disenfranchisement?

Florida-crimeshop

Florida Supreme Court

The Florida supreme court today heard arguments about whether or not to allow voters to decide on the Voting Restoration Amendment.

felon-voting-crimeshop.jpg

It is estimated that more than 1.6 million Florida residents, including nearly 1 in 4 black’s  are currently barred from the polls in Florida due to the state’s strict disenfranchisement law.

If the Florida Supreme Court is agreeable to the Amendment voters in the state will vote in 2018 to allow former felons the rights to vote. Only those convicted of murder or felony sexual offenses would still be unable to vote in the state should the Voting Restoration Amendment pass.

Florida by the way currently has one of the most strict  felon disenfranchisement laws in the country.  

Aside from Florida, Kentucky, Virginia, and Iowa permanently bar those with felony convictions from voting for life unless they seek clemency which no one ever really truly gets.

The problem with permanent felon disenfranchisement is that we instill into the minds of criminals that doing the time, paying the fines, taking the classes, the parole, the probation, the therapy and community service are all paying the debt they owe to society.

They are still disenfranchised for life regardless. They are unable to vote in some states, while other states make them jump through hoops in order to vote.

The other problem with disenfranchisement is that it bars some former felons from the ability to gain employment, something they need in order to become what we tell them they need to become.

Contributing members of society.

Without jobs, housing and certain rights they can never be contributing members of society.

We are taught that we sentence criminals so as to teach them a lesson and to prevent them from committing more crimes.

They are sentenced to jail in an effort to reform them.

That is what we are taught is happening through the sentencing process of our Judicial systems.

The reality is that is not what happens and these individuals face a lifetime sentence after released from jails and prisons. 

While the intention is well meant, the truth is the entire system is designed to disenfranchise criminals on a permanent basis regardless of type of crime committed, age the crime was committed, years they spent after said crime staying out of trouble and the like.

For a former felon it doesn’t matter how much time has passed, being disenfranchised is a lifetime sentence.

A small step in the right direction is to fix that and in states that bar former felons from voting, giving those who have not committed sex crimes or violent crimes the ability to vote after they have done the time and paid the debt to society, is in fact a step in the right direction.  

Sure we can all sit back and be judgmental and say things like “well they should have never broken the law in the first place.”

True and fair however, taking away the rights of someone for life who has not committed certain sexual or violent types of crimes is, actually a crime in and of itself.

Cristal M Clark

IOS users can find The Crime Shop on Apple News

@thecrimeshop on twitter

And https://gab.ai/thecrimeshop

 

 

The Diamond Knot Killer – The Original Night Stalker

Original Night Stalker-CrimeShop.jpg

California

Investigators in California estimate that 50 rapes which occurred in Alameda, Contra Costa, Santa Clara, Sacramento, Stanislaus, San Joaquin and Yolo were committed by the Original Night Stalker, also known as; The East Area Rapist, The Diamond Knot Killer and the Golden State Killer.

DNA evidence also just so happened to conclusively link him to 8 murders which occurred in Dana Point, Goleta, Ventura, and Irvine, California although it is believed that he committed up to at least 12 murders in all.

2 other murders in Goleta were linked by MO but, not DNA. Additionally, investigators believe that the same perpetrator either The Original Night Stalker or his copycat committed 3 other murders, 2 in Rancho Cordova and 1 in Visalia.

The Original Night Stalker struck in both  Northern California and in Southern California from 1979 all the way through 1986.

His last crime and the only one after 1981 was in 1986.

east-area-rapist-crime-shop

Between 6/18/76 to 10/1/79 The Original Night Stalker struck at least 22 times before taking a 3 month break. In all of his attacks during this time he was only raping women.

By his 30th attack, he was ready to kill and he murdered Brian and Katie Maggiore.

At his 37th attack he took another 3 month break.

In a case such as this it is not surprising to see a copycat, what is surprising is the copycat’s accuracy when it comes to being able to mimic The Original Night Stalkers crimes, save for the inability to copy the DNA.  

Investigators found evidence that he would watch his victims, specifically watch them engaging in sexual activity shortly before killing them.

And with couples, initially, he would watch a couple, he would then gain entry into the couple’s home, tie them up, using what investigators dubbed a “very specific” type of knot known as the diamond knot, he would rape the female then bludgeon the couple to death.

By the 2nd murder, the killer began to cover the heads of his victims prior to bludgeoning them to death. It is commonly believed the reason that the killer began covering the heads of his victims was due to the fact that when you bludgeon someone to death it can be quite messy.

By the 3rd murder, the original night stalker killed his first female victim who was alone.

He liked the same area’s and felt comfortable in them. He was also one of those fellows that I refer to as the commoners.

Someone you might see so often that you hardly notice when they are around meaning he had the ability to blend in, making it appear that he belonged in and around the area’s he killed in.

What makes this killer interesting is that some profilers believe that the original night stalker had a hate for women. I disagree with that.

This killer likes women, but his view of them is a bit off. He views women as property to be used for sexual gratification then discarded in any manner he wished. If he had or has a partner the partner is the sub in the relationship, to the killer the sub is his and he can do anything that he wants with her.

It is far from hate and very much about the ability to gain complete and total control over another. He is driven by sex and sexual fantasies which are more about complete control. It is a far cry from hating women.

His sexual taste would follow the lines of Sadism in that he derives a great deal of sexual pleasure from the ability to inflict pain and suffering upon another individual that is what gets him off. The ability see his partner suffer is what does it for him.

Sadism is part of Paraphilias which are of the behaviors in a group of sexual problems associated with sexual arousal in response to being stimulated in ways not associated with normal sexual behavior patterns.

His sexual tastes however, unless caught red handed are not something many other than a willing partner would know about outside of the bedroom.

He engaged in sexual deviant behaviors yet I would not go as far as to say that he engaged in sexual activity with ladies of the night, it simply would not have been something that he would do.

Although he would have been a fan of dom/sub porn. Always viewing women as property, things to be used for his sexual pleasure.

He was well mannered, he was friendly, very friendly with people. He is a narcissistic type of person and very manipulative.

He also would lie or play mind games for lack of better words with individuals for his mere enjoyment.

Through the years letters and poems have been written by those claiming to the have been The Original Night Stalker to local papers however, I doubt very much that they were from him. It isn’t his style, it isn’t something he would have done.

More often than not he would tell tall tales about his life in order to make himself appear better or more than he actually was.

Maybe faking family, education, military or work backgrounds.  

He had an income yet he could afford to carry out his attacks in the late night to early morning hours.

I believe that he was in good shape, would have been well groomed, a charming individual, someone who would not have been seen as a threat.

Investigators believed at one time that the diamond knot the killer used might have been enough to lead them right to him because it was such a specific type of knot.

Sadly, it was never quite enough and because of the media broadcasting that detail so much after the first murder, it allowed for copycats to learn and then mimic the knot.

Investigators also feared that he ended up in jail or dead before being caught. I doubt jail for anything major.

He may very well have died or found a willing partner to carry out his fantasies with or simply moved out of the US, or decided that the risk was too high should he carry on any further.

It is difficult to say for certain if he would have had a troubled childhood in that he might have had a record. Men like this are usually really adept at making sure they don’t get caught, even at an early age.

It would be more likely that he engaged in deviant sexual behavior, perhaps raped as a teen and was able to manipulate his way out of the situation.

I would actually start with that and work my way back with it, it is amazing how a woman will open up years after what she felt was a crime that had been committed against her.

It is my belief that to find out who The Original Night Stalker was, investigators and the FBI would do well to work it from the teen years forward.

Too many copycats may have been committing like crimes during this time and have complicated things.

The key is finding that one guy who was able to fly under the radar for so long, as a teen he would have raped someone without a doubt.

Someone who has yet to tell.

Cristal M Clark

IOS users can find The Crime Shop on Apple News

@thecrimeshop on twitter

And https://gab.ai/thecrimeshop

Jail overcrowding becoming an issue in Denver

Denver Jail-Crimeshop.jpg

Denver – Colorado

In a plea last week Denver, Colorado Sheriff’s Deputies are asking for some relief because the jail is housing on average at least 1,500 inmates per day.

denver-sheriff-CrimeShop.jpg

The deputies say that the overcrowding is putting both them and inmates in danger.

Deputy Mike Britton, vice president of The Denver Sheriff Fraternal Order of Police Lodge #27, said that the deputies pleas for relief have fallen on deaf ears so they have decided to make their concerns public.

To give you some background, deputies take on the responsibility of sorting and housing inmates based upon the inmate’s crime (s), gang-affiliation, gender as well as other factors.  

Obviously that can become difficult or problematic when faced with overcrowded conditions at the jail.

As a whole this is a systematic problem because our judicial system has a nasty habit of incarcerating the poor for failing to pay fines that exceed incomes, fines that are assigned to someone who is homeless or jobless, classes the poor must pay for that they cannot afford, so they skip them and things like community service which takes time from the honest attempting to seek gainful employment.

The system’s focus is not rehabilitate to prevent crime but to make money off of the crime.

If it’s true focus were to actually prevent crime and rehabilitate it would be working towards that and not against it.

The other issue happens to be city council policies which require police to arrest individuals for petty offenses or issue citations for said petty offenses, which in turn then lead to ridiculous sentencing practices.

Let’s not forget those suffering from mental illness that are housed in jail. They should not be housed in jail and not one Judge sitting on any bench is qualified to sentence someone who suffers any mental illness unless they have committed the act of murder.

If the offense is petty the mentally ill should not be sentenced to fines, classes or community service as that only serves to further exacerbate the illness the individual faces.

I’ve personally clerked for Judges who cared less about the individual standing in front of them and sentenced someone the mentally ill for no other reason that it was that municipalities policy to punish the individual for petty offenses, those who were sentenced were the mentally handicapped, a woman who had hoarding disorder and a man who had dementia who had no idea what he had done.

The list could go on and on with the inhumane injustices that I witnessed during my tenure working for a Judge.

To fix the overcrowding we need to change policy and that starts with our judicial system not the sheriff’s who are reaping that which the system has sewn.

Cristal M Clark

IOS users can find The Crime Shop on Apple News

@thecrimeshop on twitter

And https://gab.ai/thecrimeshop

 

US intelligence has become politicized

us-fbi-crimeshop

Sen. Ron Wyden’s thoughts on the FBI & James Comey

A few days ago news started to break with regard to Sen. Ron Wyden’s thoughts on FBI Director James Comey in that he feels that James has made the choice to use classification to hide information about possible Russian interference in the US election for political reasons, according to what he told the New Yorker.

Ron-Wyden-Crimeshop.jpg

“My increasing concern is that classification now is being used much more for political security than for national security.”

Sen. Ron Wyden and 6 of his colleagues on the Senate Intelligence Committee to former President Obama 3 weeks after the election saying that the senators “believe there is additional information concerning the Russian Government and the US election that should be declassified and released to the public.”

Of course talk of this has been going on since Trump won the election, many have boldly accused our newly elected president of attempting to politicize intelligence.

donald-trump-crimeshop

The reality is that doesn’t surprise me, of course Trump would make that move it is precisely who and what he is as a human being.

What would surprise me however is if James actually is hiding intel and allowing for his agency to become politicized.

FBI-Director-James-Comey-Crimeshop.jpg

That is not who or what he is or was as a human being.

Cristal M Clark

IOS users can find The Crime Shop on Apple News

@thecrimeshop on twitter

And https://gab.ai/thecrimeshop

Trump administrations showing its ineptitude about recreational pot

recreational-pot-crimeshop

Sean Spicer – Donald Trump

This administration’s desire to roll back recreational cannabis is absolutely absurd to me.

It clearly shows the ineptitude at which this administration is operating, the lack of general knowledge and understanding let alone the lack of education they have about cannabis is mind boggling.

I understand that Trump has friends in big Pharma and he’d like to line his own pockets, however allow for me to point out that legal cannabis is where the money is. The numbers do in fact, add up in state revenues for those states that have legalized.

My sneaking suspicion is that Trump and his administration are receiving pressure from big pharma which makes the most logical sense in this case (unless these guys are really that inept about cannabis), to come down hard on the industry because, big pharma has pretty much been denied access to it since day 1.

Which is the way it should be, keep big pharma out of the industry all together.  

As far as the idea or notion that cannabis is a gateway drug, yes it is a gateway drug…to the fridge and junk food, to a better mental frame of mind for those that struggle with issues that relate to debilitating mental illnesses and the like.

sean-spicer-crimeshop

Contrary to what Sean Spicer may have said, cannabis is not a gateway to opioids and what’s more is that never has that ever been proven.

It’s said a lot but not one individual has taken the time to sit down and actually conduct a study in an effort to prove that cannabis is a gateway drug to other drugs, period.

Hands down, it is rare to run across someone who is both high and violent, the truth is, about the only times that ever happens is when the user has mixed his/her high with another substance, prescription meds for depression or other mood disorders and/or alcohol or the user has a sever enough mental disorder that he or she is a danger to themselves or others.   

Cannabis is being utilized currently for those that suffer from alcoholism as a way to kick that habit and it is working for those that are trying it.

What’s more is that cannabis is being utilized for those who suffer from opioid addiction as well, to help kick that habit, and it appears to work for those that have tried it.

The most promising use of cannabis comes from those that suffer from mental disorders such as anxiety, depression, PTSD, etc. I have personally seen it help individuals cope with and manage such disorders.

The users are not getting high either, they get the right stuff and use it in moderation and it enables them to lead a healthy, productive life like a normal individual.

The benefit is that they are not dealing with addiction issues when they use cannabis to help cope with some mental disorders or for pain management.

Unlike other drugs, namely prescription medications, cannabis is really not that habit forming to be honest, for most they can take it or leave it without the nasty side effects one would have when let’s say they stop taking the mood-altering medications that so many doctors prescribe these days.

It is clear that this administration has failed and pretty hard to actually do it’s homework and they are just jumping into the fire.

I say let them burn, because the outcome of trying to roll back recreational cannabis will not play into this administration’s favor. Not at all.

Cristal M Clark

IOS users can find The Crime Shop on Apple News

@thecrimeshop on twitter

And https://gab.ai/thecrimeshop